To link to the entire object, paste this link in email, IM or document
To embed the entire object, paste this HTML in website
To link to this page, paste this link in email, IM or document
To embed this page, paste this HTML in website
Washburn Law Journal, Vol. 48 (2008-2009)
Taking Back the Fifth: Why Kansas' Approach to Inverse Condemnation Violates the United States Constitution and Leads to Unnecessary Confusion [Estate of Kirkpatrick v. Olathe, 178 P.3d 667 (Kan. Ct. App. 2008)] (Jonathan D. Stokes), p. 241-266
To obtain copyright permission for any piece appearing in the current volume or a back issue of the Washburn Law Journal, please submit written request to: Editor-in-Chief, Washburn Law Journal, Washburn University School of Law, 1700 SW College Ave., Topeka, KS 66621 (e-mail: journaleditor [at] washburnlaw.edu ; phone: 785-670-1683).
Taking Back the Fifth: Why Kansas' Approach to Inverse Condemnation Violates the United States Constitution and Leads to Unnecessary Confusion [Estate of Kirkpatrick v. Olathe, 178 P.3d 667 (Kan. Ct. App. 2008)] (Jonathan D. Stokes), p. 241-266
