To link to the entire object, paste this link in email, IM or document
To embed the entire object, paste this HTML in website
To link to this page, paste this link in email, IM or document
To embed this page, paste this HTML in website
Washburn Law Journal, Vol. 50 (2010-2011)
Kansas' Rationale Is Dust in the Wind: Why the Dismissed Supplemental Claim Exception to the General Rule of Claim Preclusion Is Necessary [Rhoten v. Dickson, 223 P.3d 786 (Kan. 2010)] (Patricia J. Kluin), p. 511-536
To obtain copyright permission for any piece appearing in the current volume or a back issue of the Washburn Law Journal, please submit written request to: Editor-in-Chief, Washburn Law Journal, Washburn University School of Law, 1700 SW College Ave., Topeka, KS 66621 (e-mail: journaleditor [at] washburnlaw.edu ; phone: 785-670-1683).
Kansas' Rationale Is Dust in the Wind: Why the Dismissed Supplemental Claim Exception to the General Rule of Claim Preclusion Is Necessary [Rhoten v. Dickson, 223 P.3d 786 (Kan. 2010)] (Patricia J. Kluin), p. 511-536